Bitdefender is throwing a gen:lazy.339029 and deleting the file #9

New Issue

@pro83 open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe to use
you can share the source code here for everyone but the compiled extractor could perfectly be infected and the average 'dumb' user won't be able to check this out.

> And it’s open source so you can check if it’s safe @pro83 open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe to use you can share the source code here for everyone but the compiled extractor could perfectly be infected and the average 'dumb' user won't be able to check this out.

techguy16 commented

2023-06-04 23:26:10 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@TheRealAnubiss it's your Antivirus.

Yarpopcat08 commented

2023-07-16 11:17:05 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

And it’s open source so you can check if it’s safe

@pro83 open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe to use you can share the source code here for everyone but the compiled extractor could perfectly be infected and the average 'dumb' user won't be able to check this out.

Well, it would be very risky for such a known enthusiast as Enderman to do such thing, wouldn't it? And also, as the program is open-source, users can always compile it htemselves.

> > And it’s open source so you can check if it’s safe > > @pro83 open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe to use you can share the source code here for everyone but the compiled extractor could perfectly be infected and the average 'dumb' user won't be able to check this out. Well, it would be very risky for such a known enthusiast as Enderman to do such thing, wouldn't it? And also, as the program is open-source, users can always compile it htemselves.

techguy16 commented

2023-07-17 06:54:04 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Yarpopcat08 the antivirus would complain even for a self-compiled copy because of it being a "untrusted application". This is why most devs have no AV or use Linux (myself included).

Back on topic, the user would know that it's fine because they compiled it.

@Yarpopcat08 the antivirus would complain even for a self-compiled copy because of it being a "untrusted application". This is why most devs have no AV or use Linux (myself included). Back on topic, the user would know that it's fine because they compiled it.

Bang1338 commented

2023-07-22 10:30:30 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

And it’s open source so you can check if it’s safe

@pro83 open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe to use you can share the source code here for everyone but the compiled extractor could perfectly be infected and the average 'dumb' user won't be able to check this out.

"open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe"

This actually true, but the code here is safe.

> > And it’s open source so you can check if it’s safe > > @pro83 open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe to use you can share the source code here for everyone but the compiled extractor could perfectly be infected and the average 'dumb' user won't be able to check this out. "open source doesn't necessarily mean it's safe" - This actually true, but the code here is safe.

techguy16 commented

2023-07-22 22:57:27 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Bang1338 is there an antivirus for scanning code? I don't think so.

Yes, this repository hosts safe code too.

@Bang1338 is there an antivirus for scanning code? I don't think so. Yes, this repository hosts safe code too.

Bang1338 commented

2023-07-26 08:34:23 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Bang1338 is there an antivirus for scanning code? I don't think so.

Yes, this repository hosts safe code too.

nah there's no antivirus for scanning that, you have to use your brain to scan it

> @Bang1338 is there an antivirus for scanning code? I don't think so. > > Yes, this repository hosts safe code too. nah there's no antivirus for scanning that, you have to use your brain to scan it

techguy16 commented

2023-07-26 09:53:22 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Bang1338 It was a joke.

Sign in to join this conversation.